Spandex As A Policy Support For Heavy Industrialization Of Special Fiber Materials

The importance of "P > Xinxiang chemical fiber 12 thousand tons spandex project to enhance its profitability and risk tolerance is self-evident.

However, judging from the price of the four major domestic spandex listed companies, Taihe new material, Huafeng spandex, and Yu Li holdings are proud and powerful. Only Xinxiang chemical fiber is slightly inferior.

The reason why spandex business share is limited. The company's annual output of 20 thousand tons of viscose filament production line in July 26th, the Ministry of industry and Commerce in 2013 to eliminate backward production capacity list is even worse.

< /p >

< p > although the first time announcement of Xinxiang chemical fiber was clarified, the elimination part accounted for only 10% of the total annual production capacity of the company, accounting for 15% of the annual production capacity of the viscose filament and 7% of the annual sales of the company. According to the current market situation of viscose staple fiber, the performance of the company had little impact on the company's performance. However, because of the elimination of backward production capacity in 2012, the Xinxiang egret Chemical Fiber Group Co., Ltd., the same group holding the group's two list of bad luck, could not escape.

< /p >

< p > the elimination of backward production capacity list of the Ministry of industry and Commerce involved 19 listed companies in 19 industries. < a target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > textile < /a > industry besides Xinxiang chemical fiber list, there is also known as "lying in the gun" of the shares.

The company said that the list of Zhejiang lat Sha Knitting Co., Ltd. as the controlling shareholder of the group of lssha group, mainly engaged in the manufacture and sale of socks, wrapped yarn and other products, and the listed company lssha shares is only the same substantive control enterprise related party, the elimination of printing and dyeing capacity of 17 million 500 thousand meters has no impact on the company.

< /p >

< p > however, the pleas of listed companies can not prevent investors' doubts. The conflict of negative information can not be written off by the listed companies which are related to the interests of investors. They claim that they are not affected but they are secretly hurt.

For those entities that can't afford to get rid of it, they still do not know how many unseen places may breed "tricky". At the beginning, many enterprises across the country heard that closing or eliminating part of the backward production lines would receive a lot of subsidies, but finally they learned that due to the Limited financial resources, the rumored subsidies amounted to only one million yuan, with a minimum of only tens of thousands of yuan, and the cost of replacing equipment was much more than that.

All of this, when we saw the Ministry of industry's elimination of backward production capacity list in fourth years, we could not help asking questions: < /p >

< p > Where did the time lag come from? On the other hand, the Ministry of industry and Commerce requested the relevant companies to strive to complete the task before the end of September. On the other hand, nearly 8 of the listed companies said the task had been completed several months ago or even last year. The earliest record of Xinxiang chemical fiber certification is the seventh seventh board deliberation motion held in April 16th.

The existence of time difference either reflects the lag of environmental monitoring, or suspects that the local government is acting on behalf of others, and finally becomes a digital game.

< /p >

Who will finish the job? A post that involves a capacity elimination of a listed company stock will trigger a high reprint. It means that if someone says that your home TV is a high-energy product that consumed 8 years ago, it should eliminate new ones. What would you think if it was a business announcement, but if it's a serious request from the Department concerned that you must buy a new one, what do you think? "Most of the commentary said that if we need to eliminate something, we must finally have the market has the final say, such as taking out an environmental indicator, the same size as the enterprise. In order to get across the harsh threshold, we may have to invest heavily in the investment. After estimating the enterprise's opinion that it is not cost-effective, it will automatically go out. < p > Investment Guidelines

< /p >

< p > why does control capacity fail? The so-called "excess capacity" is a relative concept, and its liquidity is closely related to the industry.

From the typical type, it is obvious that the "dumping flow" to the central and western part of the industry is obviously the most unreasonable. The disadvantages of the "shared flow" formed by the merger and reorganization of enterprises instead of shutting down and exiting are also very obvious. At present, the elimination of backward production capacity in China is mainly the service of the concentration of industries, and there is no provision for the digestion of the supporting industries of the discharged products, resulting in the more vicious circle of excess elimination.

< /p >

< p > the most popular way of thinking at present is "blocking the edges and spreading the sides".

Experts believe that it is necessary for China to change the traditional thinking of eliminating backward production capacity and only grasping the output of production terminals. Instead, we should consider recycling a supporting industry from the downstream of the production end, guiding the high efficiency growth with zero emission thinking, instead of driving out the matter rudely like now.

< /p >